"الملف 14/115 VII الملحق (B 9) أكسيد جزيرة أبو موسى: مواد خلفية حول هذه القضية" [و‎‎٣‎٢‎٩] (١٩٠٤/٦٨٤)

3? c |
(Hi Proof that mmi Sanaiyeh undarstood him in that
aena# and reqwotod his words bnc": to him but more
//i €? i ! %
UMm^ /
(lii) •v'h® opinion of the well known Mionlonsry the Hevd.
t»«S, Zttmert «ho has laboured for some 18 years
MCftlg the Arabs of tha Gulf and probably tenowt? tholr
local pecularitioa of epoooh and T^riting better than
any iivirjg man. K© has no hesitation in saying that
the moaning intended# and the natural interpretation
to place upon the sentence le "The annulment of this
"contract i« better than ito nooeptance*Zt^ Ms
'/fits collective testimony disposes of the arguments which the
Ceraan8 have baaed on the forced interpretation which they
hMAj^ h a/x-j fyx+lk
(( !>. VHI? i- . T.. 01 Tr ■- A QVK u x
AS mlh m ualcqim am mwu* approval
OF THE OONOU'SIOB OF THF" AOREHItBNT*
We contend that after seeing the text of the agreenent
none of then approved of It - suoh approval as was exnresaed
#
, , h-ti ,i,vinduced by the deliberate fuepreasion of facts by Hasan.
(68). it- mmummuor msoatatto* A : U the Kxtart OF HA AIMS
POiVEiiS 10 ACT i'On TIE PARtltEnS*
The asiower to the arguments on this point is that the
docro.T.ent quoted as Annex 14 of the German Rejoinder is not a
completed doounent aniS bears no signatures. It 'was not ac
cepted by Abdul L'-tif and was never completed or signed up.
Jt
it has never been aeon by Shelkli Sagar# Maloolai or Sejef
and has never been quoted or acted upon by any of the partiee,^
and no accounts have over been rendered by Hasan All samiyeh
fn
ae would have been required had it been operativeiwrt
I appimd a st&tonent by Abdul Latif on the aub^
nex /'2~ ) and would also refer to the statenent of Isa bin
Abdul Latif datedl7th Jluhaprea 1336 (»80tti January 1908)
forcing