'ملف رقم (22/16 II (A66 جوادر' [ظ‎‎١‎٢‎٠] (٣٨٠/٢٤٧)

(2) Haherail j - ana Charkki, the local B.I.Agent and' his assistant!^!)
seeing that the Post Master is hein- pressed on account of delay
caused to mails and that he might report against them have managed
to obtain few merchants signature on a complaint against Tost Easter
and "by this action they wanted to hold the Post Master in terror.
■ J3ut soon after tne <Sat Was out of hag and now all those who signed
ere saying ana admitting openly that they were led astray bv
Maheralli. moreover /these few who always derive some profit "by cheat-
-ing the B .i .Uoy. or the Insurance Coy. by joining; hends with locel
B .i. Agents are often r eady to submit to Agents will. Ve hold undeniable
proox s 'j 11.< L. Si^nci. wjj. e v?ere 0; tained by Maheralli when some went to
bim iO- c-e-i» spj < nd he took a deputation to few others for obtaining
signatures and now e^rery signee is repenting.
Such baseless unfounded complaints are being poured in your office
as some merchants are of opinion that the Post Master is the only
helpless man in world who cannot do anything to the f alse complainants ;
I
in return and they may make a target of him when and however they
like.Moreover it appears that the Postal Officers themselves enter-
k i '||
-tain and invite complaints against their subordinates as they never
even give a bluff or warning to tne false complainants.
k.'
(b) now we come to our real point that when it has been proved that
; ■ ■' 1 ■ ■
la
the G.J.noodbhoy uoys employee are responsible for causing wilful
detention to mails* what actions the authorities are going to take.
Will the authorities punish them as required under some Indian Fost
Office Act if not why.
If reliables C.J.Hoodbhoy & Coy are not in a position to get some
reliable and good working men they can make room for better men and
as there are ample number of merchants who are willing to undertake
the conveyance of mails at reduced rates with guarantee of absolute
and entire satisfaction.
in conclusion we wish to add that if no suitable action is taken
fcnnediately in the matter we will be compelled to form the opinion
that either the Postal Officers are themselves accessary and accomplic
m companys wilful detention to mails or the xndian Post Office act
is framed onJ^' r wi th a veew to fill up some blank pages of the otatute
Wok and not for punishing the guilty ones and offenders.
Yours faithfully
i