"ملخص عن التدابير البحرية في الخليج العربي، ١٨٦٢-١٩٠٥" [‎٢‎٦] (٦٤/٣٤)

26
modern guns steaming 12 knots would do the work now. The Resident with
the Lawrence at Bushire could reach Maskat in 48 hours instead of in 80 in one
of the old Admiralty " tools." Piracy, as formerly understood, was unknown and
ships were little required; all three of them were out of the Gulf looking for
slave dhows for 4 months in the year. Captain Hext was of opinion that with
another ship like the Lawrence in the reserve, the Sphinx taken over from the
Admiralty, and for the Indian Government to do all the work, it would be
much better done and at a saving of ^15,000 a year.
^4. In despatch No. 2, dated the 8th
ro. No 292, tbtd. March 1887, the Government of India
stated:—
" We have Again considered whether some further reduction could not be made, and
we have arrived at the conclusion that the number of vessels may well be reduced to four.
One vessel is required for the Bay of Bengal, another should be stationed at Aden, a
third in the Persian Gulf, and there should always be a vessel at Bombay ready for service
in the Persian Gulf. In this manner the Persian Gulf, the Indian Ocean and the Bay of
Bengal wouH each be watched by a ship of war, and there would always be a vessel in
reserve, ready to reinforce or relieve the vessel in the Gulf, or for service elsewhere, if
required, and this number we think sufficient for the ordinary requirements of India so far
as our Government is concerned.
We accordingly recommend that the squadron of six vessels be reduced to four, a
proportionate reduction being made in the subsidy of ^70,000 which the Government of
India are now required to pay to the Admiralty, the saving then effected will amount to
£ 2 3i32 2 > or about 3 lakhs, and will cover the expenditure which we have to provide for ;
thus, without actual increase to the Indian Marine expenditure, admitting of a substantial
improvement to the naval defences of India."
35. In consequence of ihe difficulties which were constantly arising between
rj , , . T 000 m < the Indian and Home Governments, in
External A., June 1888, Nos. 25-36. . • , i- c
connection with the adjustment 01 expen
diture incurred on account of the repair, docking, etc., of Royal Navy vessels
on the East India station, a committee assembled in 1888 and made the
following proposals :—
1. That 4 vessels be employed continually on Indian waters, of which one
shall always be in the Persian Gulf.
2. That an annual subsidy payment of ^"38,500 be made by the Govern
ment of India to the Admiralty, subject to a deduction of
^"28 -15 -0 a day for each vessel below the complement.
3. That the Government of India pay also the cost of extra coal consumed
when in service under requisition by the Indian authorities.
4. 1 hat a further payment of 5 per cent, a year towards replacement be
made on the cost price of the Sphinx, and of any future vessel
constructed under special design exclusively for service in the
Persian Gulf.
r'
5. That when a vessel has been in dock for more than 30 days, she shall
ce^se to be reckoned in the complement.
6. That all repairs be effected at the cost of the Admiralty, subject, in the
case of vessels that have served in the Persian Gulf, to a propor
tionate contribution by India.
7. That no charges be made for docking, except where actual outlay
is incurred.
36. Tne Admiralty approved of these proposals, but as it was very probable
that the cost would proportionately incrtiase if newer types of vessels carrying
more expensive complements were substituted for the vessels now on the East
India station, they were of op : nion that the report of the committee should be
adopted for one year, and that the question should be re-opened for anv revision
of the subsidy which might be necessary.